ADAPTABILITY OF WINTER WHEAT COLLECTION SAMPLES IN TERMS OF GRAIN YIELD

V M TRIPUTIN; YU N KASHUBA; A N KOVTUNENKO; L A KROTOVA; L A KROTOVA

UDC

631.527

ADAPTABILITY OF WINTER WHEAT COLLECTION SAMPLES IN TERMS OF GRAIN YIELD

Published in Vestnik of Omsk SAU · Pages 90–96 · Rubric: AGRONOMY

EDN: SGPPXN

Received: 06.03.2025 Accepted: 15.03.2025 Published: 25.03.2025

Authors

V M TRIPUTIN

YU N KASHUBA

A N KOVTUNENKO

L A KROTOVA

V M TRIPUTIN

Omsk Agricultural Research Center

YU N KASHUBA

Omsk Agricultural Research Center

A N KOVTUNENKO

Omsk Agricultural Research Center

L A KROTOVA

Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin

L A KROTOVA

Omsk State Agrarian University named after P.A. Stolypin

ABSTRACT

When creating winter wheat varieties in Western Siberia, it is important to select collectible samples with high adaptive properties. The purpose of our research was to identify the most promising numbers of the winter wheat collection, taking into account their adaptability. The coefficient of variation (V), genetic flexibility (Ymin + Ymax / 2), stability factor (SF), homeostaticity (Hom), and breeding value (Sc) were calculated. To do this, we used yield data from eleven highly productive winter wheat collection samples studied in the laboratory of winter crop breeding at the Omsk Agrarian Scientific Center (ASC) in 2022-2024. The most productive samples in the experiments were Synthetic (431 g/m 2 ) and Lasurna (421 g/m 2 ), which significantly exceeded the Omskaya 4 standard (319 g/m 2 ). The average level of yield variability was observed only in Lasurna (V = 16.8%) and Ariadna (V = 18.5%) samples. The remaining numbers were characterized by significant variability (V > 20%). The samples Kyivs'ka ostista (444), Chugyrinka (436) and Lasurna (434) were distinguished by their genetic flexibility. Gestiya (SF = 1.38), Ariadna (SF = 1.44) and Koroganka (SF = 1.47) had relative stability in comparison with other numbers in the collection. Ariadna (Hom = 13.86) was the best in terms of homeostaticity, while Ariadna (Sc = 272), Roksolana (Sc = 252) and Kyivs'ka ostista (Sc = 235) were the best in terms of breeding value. The ranking of the collection samples in accordance with the values of their yield adaptability parameters and the subsequent calculation of the average rank showed that the Ariadna (Belgorod) sample compares favorably with all other samples. Its average rank is 2.5, with a range of average rank values for the remaining numbers ranging from 4.7 to 8.8. The Ariadna (Belgorod) sample is recommended as the initial form for creating winter wheat varieties in the Omsk region.

KEYWORDS

winter soft wheat, collector's sample, grain yield, adaptability, the sum of the ranks

1. Musinov K.K., Surnachev A.S. Hozyaystvenno-biologicheskaya harakteristika sorta myagkoy ozimoy pshenicy Krasnoobskaya ozimaya // Sibirskiy vestnik s.-h. nauki. 2024. T. 54, № 1. S. 51-53. DOI: 26898/0370-8799-2024-1-6. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VDYULJ

2. Lysenko N.S., Loseva V.A., Mitrofanova O.P. Zimostoykost' myagkoy pshenicy kollekcii VIR v usloviyah Severo-Zapadnogo i Central'no-Chernozemnogo regionov Rossii // Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selekcii. 2019. T. 180, № 3. S. 41-49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2019-3-41-49 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BIFPIL

3. Ishodnyy material dlya selekcii ozimoy myagkoy pshenicy na kachestvo zerna v usloviyah severa Srednego Povolzh'ya I.D.Fadeeva, I.Yu. Ignat'eva, A.G. Hakimova [i dr.] // Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selekcii. 2022. T. 183, № 1. S. 118-126. DOI:https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2022-1-118-126 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PEQVJQ

4. Ilin S., Jockovic B., Mirosavljevic M., Momcilovic V., Acin V., Živancev D., Mikic S., Brbaklic L. The performance of the genetic gain and breeding progress of historical winter wheat cultivars set in the period from 1930 to 2013 in Southeastern Europe // Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 2022. Vol. 109, No. 3. P. 219-226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2022.109.028 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CRILTL

5. Andreev A.A., Dracheva M.K. Ocenka genotipov yarovogo yachmenya po kompleksu parametrov, opredelyayuschih ih selekcionnuyu cennost', adaptivnuyu sposobnost' v konkursnom sortoispytanii // Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury. 2023. № 3. S. 85-89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.24412/2309-348X-2023-3-85-89 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/LBEMDM

6. Mozgovoy S.S., Pantyuhov I.V., Keler V.V. Ekologicheskaya plastichnost' sortov yarovoy pshenicy v lesostepi Krasnoyarskogo kraya // Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo GAU. 2020. № 9. S. 121-128. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FRKNID

7. Zaharova N.N., Zaharov N.G. Ocenka pokazateley ekologicheskoy adaptivnosti sortimenta ozimoy myagkoy pshenicy v lesostepi Srednego Povolzh'ya // Agrarnyy nauchnyy zhurnal. 2021. № 5. S. 24-28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.28983/asj.y2021i5pp24-28 EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TQWHOK

8. Izuchenie mirovoy kollekcii pshenicy: metodicheskie ukazaniya. L.: VIR, 1984. 27 s.

9. Litun P.P. Kriteriy ocenki nomerov v selekcionnom pitomnike // Selekciya i semenovodstvo. Kiev, 1973. Vyp. 25. S. 52-58.

10. Dospehov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta. M.: Al'yans, 2014. 351 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QLCQEP

11. Goncharenko A.A. Ob adaptivnosti i ekologicheskoy ustoychivosti sortov zernovyh kul'tur // Vestnik RASHN. 2005. № 6. S. 49-53. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HSFQAX

12. Lewis D. Gene-environment interaction: A relationship between dominance, heterosis, phenotypic stability and variability // Heredity. 1954. Vol. 8. R. 333-356.

13. Hangil'din V.V., Litvinenko N.A. Gomeostatichnost' i adaptivnost' sortov ozimoy pshenicy // Nauchno-tehnicheskiy byulleten' VSGI. 1981. Vyp. 1. S. 8-14.

14. Mal'chikov P.N., V'yushkov A.A. Selekciya tverdoy pshenicy na urozhaynost' // Genetika, selekciya i semenovodstvo s.-h. kul'tur: Sbornik nauch. tr.: K 100-letiyu Samarskogo NIISH. Samara: Izd-vo "NTC", 2003. S. 89-118. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WTQETT

15. Adaptivnost' obrazcov ozimoy pshenicy v usloviyah Zapadnoy Sibiri V.M. Triputin, A.N. Kovtunenko, Yu.N. Kashuba [i dr.] // Vestnik Omskogo GAU. 2023. № 3. S. 77-82. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVJFXW

JATS XML

Editor-in-chief

Oksana Shumakova

responsible secretary

Elena Rodomazova

OT Other Indexing database

GOST

TRIPUTIN V. M., KASHUBA Y. N., KOVTUNENKO A. N., KROTOVA L. A., KROTOVA L. A. ADAPTABILITY OF WINTER WHEAT COLLECTION SAMPLES IN TERMS OF GRAIN YIELD // . 2025. pp. 90-96. EDN: SGPPXN. (Date of access 19.08.2026).

MLA

V M TRIPUTIN, KASHUBA Y. N., KOVTUNENKO A. N., KROTOVA L. A., KROTOVA L. A.. "ADAPTABILITY OF WINTER WHEAT COLLECTION SAMPLES IN TERMS OF GRAIN YIELD." (2025): 90-96. EDN: SGPPXN.

APA

TRIPUTIN V. M., KASHUBA Y. N., KOVTUNENKO A. N., KROTOVA L. A., KROTOVA L. A. (2025). ADAPTABILITY OF WINTER WHEAT COLLECTION SAMPLES IN TERMS OF GRAIN YIELD. , 90-96. EDN: SGPPXN.

Chicago

V M TRIPUTIN, KASHUBA Y. N., KOVTUNENKO A. N., KROTOVA L. A., KROTOVA L. A.. "ADAPTABILITY OF WINTER WHEAT COLLECTION SAMPLES IN TERMS OF GRAIN YIELD." , no. (2025): 90-96. EDN: SGPPXN.

WIKI

{{cite journal | author = TRIPUTIN V. M., KASHUBA Y. N., KOVTUNENKO A. N., KROTOVA L. A., KROTOVA L. A. | title = ADAPTABILITY OF WINTER WHEAT COLLECTION SAMPLES IN TERMS OF GRAIN YIELD | journal = | year = 2025 | pages = 90-96 }} EDN: SGPPXN

Copy

Export: BibTeX EndNote RefMan RusMARC

ADAPTABILITY OF WINTER WHEAT COLLECTION SAMPLES IN TERMS OF GRAIN YIELD

Confirmation