Study to determine the optimal seeding rate for the Santana pea variety for the conditions of the southern forest-steppe zone of the Omsk region was conducted in 2020-2022 at the experimental field of the Omsk State Agrarian University. Four seeding rates were taken for comparison - 0.6; 0.8; 1.0 and 1.2 million viable seeds per hectare under two conditions: without fertilizers and with the introduction of N 12 P 52 (ammophos) during seeding. During the branching phase of peas, the crops were treated with a tank mixture of herbicide, insecticide, and fungicide. The highest seedlings completeness was achieved at a seeding rate of 0.6 million viable seeds per hectare ranging from 75.0 to 76.1%, depending on the fertilization background. An increase in the seeding rate led to a decrease in this indicator to 59.7%. The survival rate of pea plants during the years of research was quite high and averaged 93.1% across the experiment. In contrast to germination, the retention rate increased with an increase in the seeding rate from 89.8 to 94.9%. With an increase in the seeding rate, the survival, as well as the pea seedling completeness, decreased from 68.7% when sowing 0.6 million germinating seeds per hectare to 56.7% when seeding 1.2 million. The highest yield was achieved at a seeding rate of 1 million viable seeds per hectare. Without fertilizers, the yield of 3.67 t/ha was obtained, and with the introduction of N 12 P 52 yield was 3.86 t/ha. Both a decrease and an increase in the seeding rate led to a decrease in yield. The application of fertilizers, regardless of the seeding rate, led to a significant increase in yield compared to the unfertilized background.
peas, seeding rate, seed yield, seedling completeness, survival rate
1. Zotikov V.I., Sidorenko V.S. Razvitie proizvodstva zernobobovyh kul'tur v Rossiyskoy Federacii // Zernobobovye i krupyanye kul'tury. 2018. № 2(26). S. 4-10. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UQRBKK
2. Karpova L.V. Produktivnost' i kormovaya cennost' zernobobovyh kul'tur pri vyraschivanii na raznyh fonah pitaniya // Niva Povolzh'ya. 2010. № 3(16). S. 22-23. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/MUFULB
3. Milovanova Z.G. Gerbicidy v posevah goroha // Zaschita i karantin rasteniy. 2001. № 4. S. 22-23.
4. Eliseeva N.S., Bankrutenko A.V. Urozhaynost' i soderzhanie tyazhelyh metallov v zerne goroha // Vestnik Novosibirskogo GAU. 2017. № 1(42). S. 49-55. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YJKCVD
5. Hrach jako trala Soucast osevniho postupu. Uroda. 1987;35(1):35-37.
6. Koepf H.H., Schaumann W., Haccius M. Biologisch-Dynamische Landwirtschaft Verlag Eugen Ulmer Stuttgart. 1996. 376 s.
7. Bockmann H. Ertragsleistung und Ertragsicherheit von Weizen nachverschiedenen Vortrűchten. Nachrichenb. Dtsch. Pflanzenschutzd. 1978;(28):1-4.
8. Shpaar D. i dr. Zernobobovye kul'tury / pod obsch. red. D. Shpaara, V. Pyl'nikova. M.: OOO "DLVAgrodelo". 2014. 272 s.
9. Tolstousov V.P. Udobreniya i kachestvo urozhaya. M.: Kolos. 1974. 261 s.
10. Debelyy G.A. Zernobobovye kul'tury v Nechernozemnoy zone RF. M.: Nemchinovka. 2009. 260 s.
11. Postovalov A.A. Vnesenie mineral'nyh udobreniy kak priem povysheniya ustoychivosti k boleznyam i effektivnosti vozdelyvaniya goroha v Kurganskoy oblasti // Vestnik Altayskogo GAU. 2012. № 10(96). S. 43-46. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PDFOVB
12. Postovalov A.A. Vliyanie mineral'nyh udobreniy na fitosanitarnoe sostoyanie rizosfery goroha // Vestnik Kurganskoy GSHA. 2018. № 1(25). S. 45-47. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/URVTTO
13. Dzhandarov A.N. Vliyanie tehnologiy vozdelyvaniya na rost, razvitie i urozhaynost' goroha na chernozeme obyknovennom Central'nogo Predkavkaz'ya: avtoref. dis. kand. s.-h. nauk 4.1.1 - obschee zemledelie i rastenievodstvo, Stavropol'. 2023. 22 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DXCHXZ
14. Hamokov H.A. Vliyanie mineral'nyh udobreniy na pokazateli fitosinteticheskoy i simbioticheskoy deyatel'nosti posevov soi, goroha i viki // Vestnik Altayskogo GAU. 2018. № 1(159). S. 30-34. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YNHCWK
15. Mitrofanov D.V., Kaftan Yu.V. Vliyanie sornyh rasteniy i ammofosa na vyhod zerna goroha v stepnoy zone Yuzhnogo Urala // Vestnik Novosibirskogo GAU. 2020. № 4(57). S. 35-45. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TQWUQU
16. Kryuchkov N.M. Zernobobovye kul'tury v Zapadnoy Sibiri. Omsk. 1990. 68 s.
17. Kirik N.N., Pikovskiy M.I. Gribnye bolezni goroha // Zaschita i karantin rasteniy. 2006. № 6. S. 46-49. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HTVQQP
18. Zotikov V.I., Golopyatov M.T., Akulov A.S. i dr. Resursosberegayuschaya tehnologiya proizvodstva goroha: metod. rekomendacii. Orel: VNIIZBK. 2009. 52 s.
19. Gaydar A.A. Osnovnye elementy tehnologii vyraschivaniya sortov goroha polubezlistochkovogo tipa na zerno i semena v usloviyah yuzhnoy lesostepi Omskoy oblasti: avtoref. dis. kand. s.-h. nauk: 06.01.09 - rastenievodstvo. Omsk. 2008. 16 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NJHHLR
20. Grigorenko I.V. Vliyanie sposobov i norm poseva na semennuyu produktivnost' sortov goroha v severnoy zone Krasnodarskogo kraya: avtoref. dis. kand. s.-h. nauk: 06.01.09 - rastenievodstvo, Persianovskiy. 2009. 25 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NLEKPV
21. Vahitova R.K. Formirovanie urozhaya goroha posevnogo v zavisimosti ot elementov tehnologii vozdelyvaniya v usloviyah Predural'ya Respubliki Bashkortostan: avtoref. dis. kand. s.-h. nauk: 06.01.09 - obschee zemledelie, rastenievodstvo. Ufa. 2015. 18. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZPWTNF
