The experiment was carried out in 2017-2023 in the conditions of the кrasnoyarsk forest steppe. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the adaptability of zoned modern varieties of spring wheat of the Krasnoyarsk Research Institute of Agriculture in terms of grain productivity. The influence of genotype factor and genotype-environment interaction to yield formation was 4% and 7%, respectively, with a high level of reliability. This proved that genotypic differences between samples have a significant impact on the formation of grain productivity. In terms of average productivity, Beiskaya (37.8 c/ha) and Svirel (37.9 c/ha) were reliably distinguished. The crop ripening of Beiskaya was 3-4 days earlier. In parameters of ecological plasticity and stability, Uyarochka (bi = 0.92) and Beiskaya (bi = 1.01) are identified as semi-intensive varieties, Kuraginskaya 2 is identified as intensive variety (bi = 1.18). Altayskaya 70 (Hom = 148.9) and Beiskaya (Hom = 139.6) were noted for greatest homeostaticity. In terms of breeding value, Beiskaya (Sc = 18.26), Altayskaya 70 (Sc = 16.84) and Kanskaya (Sc = 15.91) were distinguished. In terms of adaptability coefficient, Beiskaya (108.9%) and Svirel (108.3%) were noted. The ranking of samples according to the considered parameters of ecological plasticity and stability made it possible to characterize Beiskaya as the most adapted high-yielding variety in varying environmental conditions by years. Beiskaya is recommended for cultivation for breeding and production purposes in the East Siberian and West Siberian regions. It is emphasized that for a more objective selection assessment of varieties by adaptability, it is necessary to use various methods.
spring wheat, variety, productivity, adaptability, stability, ecological plasticity, homeostaticity, breeding value, adaptability coefficient
1. Shpedt A.A., Ligaeva N.A., Emelyanov D.V. Transformation of soil and land resources of the Middle Siberia in the conditions of climatic changes // IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Krasnoyarsk, 20-22 June 2019 / Krasnoyarsk Science and Technology City Hall of the Russian Union of Scientific and Engineering Associations. Vol. 315. Krasnoyarsk: Institute of Physics and IOP Publishing Limited, 2019. P. 52051. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GYSYZR
2. Shpedt A.A., Lipshin A.G., Lubochnikov M.G. Global'nye problemy i vyzovy agrosfery eniseyskoy Sibiri // Sovremennye problemy i perspektivy razvitiya agrohimii, zemledeliya i smezhnyh nauk o plodorodii pochv i produktivnosti polevyh kul'tur v Sibiri: mater. mezhd. nauch.-proizvod. konf. s mezhd. uchast., Krasnoyarsk, 20-22 iyulya 2022 goda. - Krasnoyarsk: FIC KNC SO RAN, 2023. S. 85-90. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IKWCPX
3. Zhuchenko A.A. Adaptivnoe rastenievodstvo (ekologo-geneticheskie osnovy): teoriya i praktika. M.: Agrorus, 2008. T. 1. 814 s.
4. Rybas' I.A. Povyshenie adaptivnosti v selekcii zernovyh kul'tur (obzor) // Sel'skohozyaystvennaya biologiya. 2016. T. 51. № 5. S. 617-626. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WZJQEN
5. Du Y.L., Xi. Y., Cui. T., Anten N.P.R., Weiner J., Li X., Turner N.C., Zhao Y.M., Li F.M. Yield components, reproductive allometry and the tradeoff between grain yield and yield stability in dryland spring wheat // Field Crops Research. 2020. Vol. 257. № 10. p. 107930. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EAZXQU
6. Safonova I.V., Anis'kov N.I. Effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya nekotoryh kriteriev opredeleniya adaptivnosti na primere sortov ozimoy rzhi // Trudy po prikladnoy botanike, genetike i selekcii. 2023. T. 184. № 2. S. 66-75. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XIWQOG
7. Triputin V.M., Kovtunenko A.N., Kashuba Yu.N., Krotova L.A. Adaptivnost' obrazcov ozimoy pshenicy v usloviyah Zapadnoy Sibiri // Vestnik Omskogo GAU. 2023. № 3(51). S. 77-82. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/CVJFXW
8. Ageeva E.V. Lihenko I.E., Sovetov V.V. Ocenka ekologicheskoy plastichnosti sortov i liniy yarovoy myagkoy pshenicy v ramkah programmy Kazahstansko-sibirskoy seti // Vestnik Omskogo GAU. 2020. № 4(40). S. 7-14. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HXAGHO
9. Metodika gosudarstvennogo sortoispytaniya s.-h. kul'tur. Vypusk pervyy (obschaya chast'). M.: Kolos, 1985. 269 s.
10. Ekologicheskaya plastichnost' sel'skohozyaystvennyh rasteniy (metodika i ocenka) / V.A. Zykin, I.A. Belan, V.S. Yusov [i dr.]. Ufa: Centr sel'skohozyaystvennogo konsul'tirovaniya RB. 2011. S. 97.
11. Dospehov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta. M.: Al'yans, 2014. 351 s. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QLCQEP
12. Hangil'din V.V., Litvinenko N.A. Gomeostatichnost' i adaptivnost' sortov ozimoy pshenicy // Nauchno-tehnicheskiy byulleten' VSGI. 1981. Vyp. 1. S. 8-14.
13. Zhivotkov L.A., Morozova Z.A., Sekutaeva L.I. Metodika vyyavleniya potencial'noy produktivnosti i adaptivnosti sortov i selekcionnyh form ozimoy pshenicy po pokazatelyu "urozhaynost'" // Selekciya i semenovodstvo. 1994. № 2. S. 3-6.2.
