To assess the reliability of combine harvesters, studies were conducted of their operation during seasonal field work and a classification of failures was performed by key characteristics: by the cause of occurrence, by changes in parameters over time, by the relationship of failures, by complexity groups. The studies were conducted in the period 2018-2023. The research program includes a justification for the number of objects of observation, a methodology for collecting information on failures, a methodology for recording the time of eliminating the consequences of failures. The article presents data on the number of failures by brand of combine harvesters, by failure characteristics, by severity groups of consequences, by structural elements of combine harvesters, by the time of restoration of operability after failure. Among the identified failures, the majority are classified as operational (54.9%), by the cause of occurrence - to sudden (91.2%), by depen-dence - to independent (69.8%), and to the first group by complexity (49.4%). The largest number of failures occurred in the reaping section (38.1%), the smallest in the engine and chassis - 1.5% and 1.1%, respectively. Elimination of failures in the reaping section takes up to 30 minutes on average, and failures in the motor unit and chassis - 5.8 hours and 4.2 hours, respectively. The time of elimination of the consequences of failures is significantly affected by the time of delivery of the element to the workshop for repair or the time of purchase and delivery of the failed element for replacement, as well as the arrival time of the service team of the dealer center. The results of the research allow us to determine ways to reduce downtime, increase the reliability of grain harvesters and optimal ways to organize maintenance and repair.
reliability, grain harvester, failure, time to eliminate the failure, downtime
1. Erohin G.N., Sazonov S.N., Konovskiy V.V. O nadezhnosti raboty sovremennyh zernouborochnyh kombaynov // Vestnik Michurinskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2013. № 6. C. 59-63. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RZOGPR
2. Komarov V.A., Nuyanzin E.A., Sivcov V.N. Analiz otkazov zernouborochnyh kombaynov v garantiynyy period // Sel'skiy mehanizator. 2024. № 2. C. 28-29. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AUGMEC
3. Korolev A.E. Sravnitel'naya bezotkaznost' zernouborochnyh kombaynov // Novaum.ru. 2019. № 17. C. 26-28. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YXYJHV
4. Krupin A.E., Lisunov E.A., Kalashov A.A. Raschet pokazateley nadezhnosti eernouborochnogo kombayna Don-1500 B // Vestnik NGIEI. 2018. № 2 (81). C. 42-53. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YQGTEQ
5. Issledovanie voznikayuschih otkazov mezhdu osnovnymi sistemami zernouborochnyh kombaynov i vremeni ih ustraneniya / A.T. Lebedev [i dr.] // Tehnicheskiy servis mashin. 2019. № 3 (136). C. 33-39. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WEONGN
6. Lomakin S.G., Berdyshev V.E. Analiz tehnicheskogo urovnya zernouborochnyh kombaynov "Rostsel'mash" // Vestnik federal'nogo gosudarstvennogo obrazovatel'nogo uchrezhdeniya vysshego professional'nogo obrazovaniya "Moskovskiy gosudarstvennyy agroinzhenernyy universitet imeni V.P. Goryachkina". 2017. № 6 (82). C. 34-42. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZWKXWR
7. Determining the workload of the machine and tractor fleet maintenance service in agriculture using the scheduling method / O.V. Myalo (Rozbah) [et al.] // EDP SCIENCES S A, 17, AVE DU HOGGAR, PA COURTABOEUF, BP 112, LES ULIS CEDEX A, FRANCE, F-91944, 2023.C. 01045.
8. Soglasovanie processov proizvodstvennoy i tehnicheskoy ekspluatacii kak osnova effektivnogo tehnicheskogo servisa / Redreev G.V. [i dr.] // Omskiy gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet imeni P.A. Stolypina, 2022.C. 309-317. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XHZXEV
9. Subochev S.V., Nemcev A.E., Kopteva (Anohina) I.V. Vliyanie osnovnyh pokazateley nadezhnosti na effektivnost' zernouborochnyh kombaynov // Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennyy agrarnyy universitet. 2014. № 2 (31). C. 157-164.
10. Shepelev S.D., Cherkasov Yu.B. Koefficient prostoya zernouborochnyh kombaynov kak kompleksnyy pokazatel' tehnicheskih otkazov // Agrarnyy vestnik Urala. 2017. № 7 (161). C. 8. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZHJIYB
11. Shepelev S.D., Cherkasov Yu.B., Shepelev V.D. Obosnovanie vremeni prostoya dlya ustraneniya posledstviy tehnicheskogo otkaza zernouborochnyh kombaynov // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2017. № 5 (128). C. 45-51. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZDBAKF
12. Analysis of the use of a combine harvester equipped with a precision farming system in rice growing conditions / S. Garkuha [et al.] // IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. 2020. № 1 (1001). C. 012027. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FFNPHI
13. Pomogaev V.M., Redreev G.V. Nformation support in the system of maintenance and repair of mobile machines in agriculture // Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2022. № 2. C. 145-152. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IPRTCH
14. Metodicheskie ukazaniya. Sbor i obrabotka informacii o nadezhnosti izdeliy v ekspluatacii RD 50-04-87 Moskva: Izd-vo standartov, 1987. 14 c.
15. GOST 27.310-95. Nadezhnost' v tehnike (SSNT). Analiz vidov, posledstviy i kritichnosti otkazov.
16. RD 50-690-89. Metodicheskie ukazaniya. Nadezhnost' v tehnike. Metody ocenki pokazateley nadezhnosti po eksperimental'nym dannym.
17. GOST 27.410-87. Nadezhnost' v tehnike. Metody kontrolya pokazateley nadezhnosti i plany kontrol'nyh ispytaniy na nadezhnost'.
18. GOST R 50779.10-2000. Statisticheskie metody. Veroyatnost' i osnovy statistiki. Terminy i opredeleniya.
