The quality and safety of food are the factors that determine the quality of human life. This determines the relevance of research on preventing the migration of toxicants along the food chain. The use of enterosorbents in animal husbandry is one of the strategies to reduce the accumulation of toxicants in animal products. In this regard, the goal was set to conduct a comparative assessment of the adsorption activity of Polysorb VP and Zoocarb in relation to some mycotoxins and insectoacaricides. The experiment was performed in vitro using standard solutions of mycotoxins and insectoacaricides, as well as standard methods for their determination. The maximum adsorption index of Polysorb VP is set in relation to the T-2 toxin. In relation to zearalenone, aflatoxin B1 and deoxynivalenol, a consistent decrease in adsorption indices is observed. The value of the index varies depending on the concentration of mycotoxin in the sample. The maximum adsorption index of Zoocarb is established in relation to deoxynivalenol, the minimum is for the sorption of T-2 toxin. The adsorption activity of Polysorb VP in relation to the studied insectoacaricides is presented in descending order: eprinomectin → deltamethrin → acetamiprid; carbon enterosorbent Zoocarb: acetamiprid → deltamethrin → eprinomectin. At the same time, the values of the adsorption indices decrease with an increase in the concentration of insectoacaricides in the samples. The revealed patterns in the in vitro experiment demonstrate the selective orientation of the action of non-selective sorbents, which can be used in clinical practice to increase the effectiveness of sorption therapy methods. In the future, it is necessary to evaluate the influence of the pH of the environment, temperature, the optimal ratio of sorbate and sorbent, and other external conditions on the rate of sorption and desorption in order to predict the success of treatment.
carbon sorbent, zoocarb, silicon dioxide, polysorb, mycotoxins, insectoacaricides
1. Food and Agriculture Organization. Livestock in the balance. FAO. 2009.
2. Nohr D., Biesalski H.K. Mealthy food: meat as a healthy and valuable source of micronutrients. Animal. 2007;1(2):309-316. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HWFCXZ
3. Neufingerl N., Eilander A. Nutrient Intake and Status in Adults Consuming Plant-Based Diets Compared to Meat-Eaters: A Systematic Review. Nutrients. 2021;14(1):29.
4. Simelane K.S., Worth S. Food and Nutrition Security Theory. Food Nutr Bull. 2020;41(3):367-379. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AZXDJF
5. Gruber-Dorninger C., Jenkins T., Schatzmayr G. Global Mycotoxin Occurrence in Feed: A Ten-Year Survey. Toxins (Basel). 2019;11(7):375.
6. Wu H., Zhao J., Wan J. A Review of Veterinary Drug Residue Detection: Recent Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions. Sustainability. 2023;15(13):10413. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EQOOCK
7. Kępińska-Pacelik J., Biel W. Alimentary Risk of Mycotoxins for Humans and Animals. Toxins (Basel). 2021;13(11):822. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OQBFOO
8. Canton L., Lanusse C., Moreno L. Rational Pharmacotherapy in Infectious Diseases: Issues Related to Drug Residues in Edible Animal Tissues. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(10):2878. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EDIBPN
9. Ospischev A.V., Kashin A.S., Kashina G.V. Kompleksnaya sistema dezintoksikacionnoy profilaktiki i farmakokorrekcii pri antropogenno-ekologicheskih boleznyah telyat // Vestnik KrasGAU. 2012. № 2. S. 176-181. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OPPCAD
10. Lebelo K.et al. Chemical Contamination Pathways and the Food Safety Implications along the Various Stages of Food Production: A Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5795. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NJHSDQ
11. Panfilova V.N., Taranushenko T.E. Primenenie enterosorbentov v klinicheskoy praktike // Pediatricheskaya farmakologiya. 2012. № 6. S. 34-39. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PMXECN
12. Gerunov T.V. i dr. Enterosorbenty v veterinarii: znachenie i perspektivy sozdaniya novyh preparatov // Innovacii i prodovol'stvennaya bezopasnost'. 2017. № 3(17). S. 17-24. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZVZPMB
13. Rabinovich M.I., Daminov R.R., Samorodova I.M. Enterosorbent Polisorb VP v veterinarnoy praktike, zhivotnovodstve i pticevodstve: metod. ukazaniya. Troick-Chelyabinsk: UGAVM, 2002. 30 s.
14. Vershinin A.S., Bychkovskih V.A., Smirnov D.M. Primenenie enterosorbenta Polisorb MP (kremniya dioksida kolloidnogo) v kompleksnoy terapii razlichnyh patologicheskih sostoyaniy, soprovozhdayuschihsya endotoksikozom (obzor literatury) // Chelovek. Sport. Medicina. 2013. № 3. S. 125-129. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PKCBRN
15. Tian B., Liu Y. Antibacterial applications and safety issues of silica-based materials: A review.Int J Appl Ceram Tec, 2020;18(2):289-301.
16. P'yanova L.G. i dr. Sozdanie i perspektivy ispol'zovaniya modificirovannyh sorbentov v veterinarnoy medicine // Vestnik Omskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2016. № 2(22). S. 138-146. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WJTERD
17. P'yanova L.G., Liholobov V.A., Sedanova A.V. Effektivnye i bezopasnye modificirovannye uglerodnye sorbenty medicinskogo i veterinarnogo naznacheniya na osnove nanoglobulyarnogo ugleroda // Toksikologicheskiy vestnik. 2016. № 6(141). S. 25-30. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XCSJQL
18. Delyagina M.S. Issledovanie adsorbcionnyh svoystv uglerodnyh sorbentov medicinskogo i veterinarnogo naznacheniy // Dinamika sistem, mehanizmov i mashin. 2022. T. 10, № 4. S. 6-12. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BVCKSB
19. P'yanova L.G. i dr. Primenenie enterosorbenta uglerodnogo zookarba v veterinarnoy medicine: metod. rekomendacii dlya specialistov veterinarnoy sluzhby. Omsk: IPK Maksheevoy E.A., 2011. 36 s.
20. SOChETANNOE DEYSTVIE MIKOTOKSINOV I INSEKTOAKARICIDOV NA ORGANIZM ZhIVOTNYH KAK DETERMINANTA RISKA POTENCIROVANNOY IMMUNOSUPRESSII I RAZVITIYa OPPORTUNISTIChESKIH INFEKCIY Gerunov T.V. NIR: grant № MD-2435.2022.5. Sovet po grantam Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federacii. 2022. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KHIOFK
