The assessment of the degree of representation of local poultry meat producers in the Omsk region was given, the assessment of consumer preferences of Omsk residents for poultry products was carried out by means of a survey of 112 respondents, a comparative veterinary and sanitary, as well as a tasting assessment of poultry meat of domestic (non-industrial) and industrial production was given. According to the results of a comparative tasting evaluation of broiler meat of domestic and industrial production, no significant differences were revealed. The indicators of home-made meat were 0.5 points higher than those of industrial meat according to criteria such as smell and consistency. The highest scores were obtained when evaluating the broth in terms of richness. When calculating KMAFAnM, the number of mesophilic, aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms in the meat of a domestic broiler was 1,0 ∙ 10 5 , which corresponds to the upper limit of the standard for this indicator. In meat of industrial production, the value of KMAFAnM was 8,0 ∙ 10 3 , which is much lower than the established norm. According to the results of sanitary and microbiological studies of Salmonella bacteria, Listeria monocytogenes bacteria and Escherichia coli bacteria in meat samples, both domestic and industrial broilers, were not detected.
poultry, poultry farming, poultry meat, tasting, organoleptic evaluation, physico-chemical studies, microbiological indicators
1. Livestock and poultry: World market and trade. URL: https://apps.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/circulars/livestock_poultry.pdf. 2022.
2. Rostunova L.V. Sravnitel'naya veterinarno-sanitarnaya harakteristika myasa pticy promyshlennogo i nepromyshlennogo proizvodstva // Aktual'nye voprosy veterinarii i biotehnologii: idei molodyh issledovateley: materialy stud. nauch. konf. Chelyabinsk, 2018. S. 204-212. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XPDFVB
3. Skotskaya O.S., Dovgan' N.B. Analiz sostoyaniya normativno-tehnicheskoy dokumentacii v sfere obespecheniya kachestva i bezopasnosti produkcii pticevodstva // Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya veterinarnoy nauki i praktiki: sb. materialov Vseros. (nac.) nauch.-prakt. konf. Omsk, 2022. S. 48-53. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HYUKWV
4. Krygin V.A., Shvager O.V. Sravnitel'naya ocenka kachestva i bezopasnosti myasa pticy, vyraschennoy promyshlennym i nepromyshlennym sposobom // Bezopasnost' i kachestvo sel'skohozyaystvennogo syr'ya i prodovol'stviya: sb. st. Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. M., 2020. S. 372-376. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WSQEWE
5. Ruban B.V. Pticy i pticevodstvo: ucheb. posobie. Har'kov: Espada, 2018. S. 136-156.
6. Urban V.G. Sbornik normativno-pravovyh dokumentov po veterinarno-sanitarnoy ekspertize myasa i myasoproduktov: ucheb. posobie dlya vuzov. SPb.: Lan', 2021. 384 s.
7. Shmat E.V., Zabolotnyh M.V., Semochkin A.V. Veterinarno-sanitarnyy kontrol' kachestva syr'ya zhivotnogo i rastitel'nogo proishozhdeniya: ucheb. posobie. SPb.: Lan', 2020. S. 6-18.
8. Skotskaya O.S., Dovgan' N.B. Sravnitel'naya degustacionnaya ocenka myasa pticy promyshlennogo i domashnego proizvodstva // Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya veterinarnoy nauki i praktiki: sb. materialov Vseros. (nac.) nauch.-praktich. konf. Omsk, 2022. S. 166-171. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UZVIJT
9. Zabolotnyh M.V., Ivkova I.A., Zhidik I.Yu. Osnovy organizacii veterinarno-sanitarnogo dela: ucheb. posobie. Omsk: Omskiy GAU, 2020. 91 s.
10. Shpak T.I. i dr. Bezopasnost' sel'skohozyaystvennogo syr'ya i produktov pitaniya: ucheb. posobie. SPb.: Lan', 2022. 163 s.
